By Brian Gaston
Food Freedom News
In Vermont, the vaccine industry attempted to
remove parents’ right to philosophical objection
to vaccines. Vermonters stood up for their rights and the
legislature stood with the people.
But this battle to remove parental rights to decide what is best
for their child affects every family in the country, and it is far
from over. The pharmaceutical industry is working state to state
to remove both philosophical and religious exemptions.
It is crucial to be clear that most families right now do not
even realize exemptions exist or how to get them, and are cowed by
school or medical or government authorities who say they must get
them which is untrue.
Parents are not informed either that
they have a choice whether to let them children be injected with
vaccines or about their dangers. From the
Alliance for Human Research Protection:
“…. the reality is that much of what
public health officials and vaccine manufacturers proclaim is not
backed by science or experience.
“…. Not only have the vaccines failed
to protect against the targeted disease, but the vaccines are
implicated in increasing the likelihood of children becoming
infected with more virulent strains of the disease.
Exemptions for vaccines go to the heart of the issue – the human
right to refuse vaccines on any basis. From
Dr. Mercola:
“The issue of protecting your right
to make an informed, voluntary vaccination choice for
yourself or your child in the United States is about defending
human rights.” As Barbara Loe Fisher, president of NVIC, states:
“‘While the State may have the legal
authority to mandate use of vaccines, nobody has the moral
authority to FORCE you to get vaccinated or vaccinate your child
without your voluntary, informed consent.’”
But the government has been allowed to put out false “health
information” around vaccines, and arguing over it serves as a
powerful distraction from two undeniable criminal actions that
vaccines are now being used to perpetrate against children’s
bodies. The need for this information and the basis for refusal
now has become urgent.
1. Any child in the US who is vaccinated with the new DNA
vaccines, and with vaccines that are part of the CDC’s mandatory
vaccine schedule (as well as any person taking the flu vaccine)
are being subjected to polysorbate 80, a sterilizing agent.
That fact is not deniable since polysorbate 80 is listed as the
preferred ingredient in a phama patent entitled “
A Fertility Impairing Vaccine.” (The
University of Georgia Research Foundation [pharmaceutical
companies, along with agribusiness] is listed as the patent
applicant.)
“In the description section of the
patent application, Tween 80 (Polysorbate 80) is listed as a
preferred ingredient:
“‘In a preferred embodiment the
vaccine comprises oil, preferably a biodegradable oil such as
squalene oil, in an amount of about 2.5% to about 15%, preferably
about 8% to about 12%. In preparing the vaccine it is advantageous
to combine a concentrated oily adjuvant composition with an
aqueous solution of the antigen, pZP glycoprotein. Typically, the
vaccine is prepared using an adjuvant concentrate which contains
lecithin (about 5% to about 15 % wt/vol, preferably about 12%
wt/vol) and STDCM (preferably about 25 mg/mL to about 50 mg/mL) in
squalene oil. The term % wt/vol means grams per 100 mL of liquid.
The aqueous solution containing the isolated pZP glycoprotein is
typically a phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) solution, and
additionally preferably contains Tween 80 (about 0.2% vol/vol to
about 0.8% vol/vol, preferably about 0.4% vol/vol).’”
That is, American children and all those taking the flu vaccine
are being subjected without their knowing to a sterilizing agent.
Put more bluntly, Americans are being subjected to compulsory
sterilization under the cover of “health.”
The pharmaceutical industry was
experimenting on Auschwitz prisoners to
develop just such vaccines, ones that could be given at routine
doctor’s appointments that would sterilize covertly.
From
Have Rabbis Forgotten the Experiments on Jewish
Women at Auschwitz?
“Auschwitz was the largest and one of
the most infamous of the camps and the site of numerous ‘medical’
experiments. This historical study uses primary source documents
obtained from archives in England and Germany to describe one type
of experiment carried out at Auschwitz — the sterilization
experiments…
“The purpose of these experiments was
to perfect a technique in which non-Aryans could be prevented from
reproducing while still being able to work as slave laborers. ….
“Dr Adolf Pokorny, a Nazi physician
wrote to Himmler in October 1941: ‘Should we succeed in obtaining
a method, permitting as quickly as possible to sterilize people
without their knowledge, then we would get hold of a new, most
effective weapon.’”
“In July 1942 Lieutenant General
Rudolf Brandt, Himmler’s personal advisor (Strzelecka 1996),
contacted Clauberg, asking on behalf of Himmler, [how long it
would take] to sterilize 1000 Jewesses. The Jewesses themselves
should not know anything about it. As the SS Reich Leader
[Himmler] understands it, you could give the appropriate injection
during a general examination.
Wikipedia’s background on
Compulsory sterilization in the US:
“The United States was the first
country to concertedly undertake compulsory sterilization programs
for the purpose of eugenics.>
[33] The heads of the program were avid
believers in eugenics and frequently argued for their program. It
was shut down due to ethical problems. The principal targets of
the American program were the
mentally retarded and the
mentally ill, but also targeted under many
state laws were the deaf, the blind, people with
epilepsy, and the physically deformed.
According to the activist
Angela Davis,
Native Americans, as well as
African-American women>
[34] were sterilized against their will in
many states, often without their knowledge while they were in a
hospital for other reasons (e.g. childbirth). Some sterilizations
took place in prisons and other penal institutions, targeting
criminality, but they were in the relative [
citation needed] minority. In the
end, over 65,000 individuals were sterilized in 33 states under
state compulsory sterilization programs in the United States.>
[35]]>
[36] ….
“After
World War II, public opinion towards
eugenics and sterilization programs became more negative in the
light of the connection with the
genocidal policies of
Nazi Germany, though a significant number of
sterilizations continued in a few states until the early 1960s.
The
Oregon Board of Eugenics, later renamed the
Board of Social Protection, existed until 1983,>
[41] with the last forcible sterilization
occurring in 1981.>
[42] The U.S.
commonwealth Puerto Rico had a sterilization program as
well. Some states continued to have sterilization laws on the
books for much longer after that, though they were rarely if ever
used. California sterilized more than any other state by a wide
margin, and was responsible for over a third of all sterilization
operations. Information about the California sterilization program
was produced into book form and widely disseminated by eugenicists
E.S. Gosney and
Paul B. Popenoe, which was said by the
government of
Adolf Hitler to be of key importance in
proving that large-scale compulsory sterilization programs were
feasible.>
[43] In recent years, the governors of many
states have made public apologies for their past programs
beginning with Virginia and followed by Oregon>
[41] and California. None have offered to
compensate those sterilized, however, citing that few are likely
still living (and would of course have no affected offspring) and
that inadequate records remain by which to verify them.
“Thus, without question, the CDC’s
mandatory child vaccine schedule requires that American children
be exposed to a sterilizing agent, not just once but between 60 to
70 times (and more if more vaccines are mandated) over the course
of their childhood, and this toxic assault on their bodies begins
on the day of birth.”
Parents not only have the right to philosophical objection to any
or all vaccines, but most certainly have the right to informed
consent. All of the mandated vaccines for their children must
include information that polysorbate 80 is a sterilizing agent and
one that is “preferred” as such in a pharmaceutical industry
patent, and therefore deemed effective.
Parents in all states have the right to protect their children
from being compulsorily sterilized in this deceptive manner. This
is a criminal assault on their children’s bodies. In truth,
parents should give this attack an even more seriously criminal
label, because “imposing measures intended to prevent births
within the group” meets the UN”s definition of
genocide.
2. Any child in the US who is vaccinated with the new DNA
vaccines and anyone taking the flu vaccine is having their DNA
being contaminated with patented GMOs.
Those being vaccinated with the new DNA vaccines are
automatically turning their “intellectual property” over their own
DNA over to the vaccine manufacturers by allowing that DNA to be
contaminated. The vaccines replicate how seeds are genetically
engineered (patented GMOs are shot into the DNA), permanently
corrupting it. But putting aside the damage to DNA, there is a
undeniable commercial issue here. NONE of the legal issues of
intellectual property rights over the DNA have been mentioned much
less settled. What claims might the vaccine companies (or
government which shares patents with it) make over the child’s
“patent-tagged” blood, organs, etc. since patented DNA would be in
all of it? Given the aggressive actions of Monsanto, a biotech
company, against farmers whose fields were contaminated –
involuntarily – by Monsanto’s patented intellectual property via
pollen drift, and Monsanto’s refusal to say they will not sue
those who were unwillingly contaminated, there is no reason to
believe that the vaccine industry, biotech companies, will behave
any differently. In fact, there is already action in Colorado to
show how the drug companies may behave around control over what is
in someone’s body.
According to the FDA (which is controlled by the drug companies),
adult stem cells are now drugs and the
government claims the right to regulate them. How much more
assertive would biotech companies behave when what is in people’s
body includes patented material?
Parents in Vermont have been arguing uphill against bogus
“health” demands put forward by the vaccine industry. But this is
a more simple argument. Parents in Vermont have the right to
protect their child’s “commercial” interests from the biotech
pharmaceutical industry, just as their farmers are working to
protect their own commercial rights from the biotech giant,
Monsanto.
This video of Daniel Ravicher, a patent
lawyer, shows how ferociously the biotech industry is behaving
around its patents. On Monsanto’s bags of GMO seeds is the
following:
“Warning! Stop, these seeds are
protected by our patents. You may only use these seeds in the ways
that we allow you to. You can’t redistribute them to anyone else.
…. You have to abide by our terms”
Ravicher explains the problem:
“Even if you don’t know you have been
contaminated, once your property comes into possession of
Monsanto’s seed, they can assert their patents against you and
they have done so against others.”
Now, try a replay, substituting biotech’s patented GMOs in
vaccines.
“Warning! Stop, these GMOs in your
DNA are patented. You may only use this genetically modified DNA
in the way we allow you to. You can’t redistribute them to anyone
else. …. You have to abide by our terms.”
And Rachiver’s comments would apply to GMO vaccines.
“Even if you don’t know you have been
contaminated, once your body comes into possession of pharma’s
GMOs, they can assert their patents against you …. “
With the pharmaceutical industry vaccines, the comment should
include the additional clause, “… even if you were denied informed
consent and forced to be contaminated by government mandates and
under false emergencies.”
Continuing from
“Have Rabbis Forgotten …?“:
“Needless to say, giving untested,
unknown vaccines is a “medical experiment” and violates the core
principles of the Nuremberg – informed and unambiguous consent.
Forcing people to take vaccines, whether by a proclaimed
“emergency,” by a “public health” order from the WHO, or by threat
of loss of rights over one’s children or of imprisonment, removes
consent, as does giving vaccines to those unable by age or mental
status to legally consent. “Informed,” as well, is hollowed of all
meaning when people are tricked into taking vaccines by the use of
false or frightening “information.”
http://www.salem-news.com/articles/november072011/experiments-auschwitz-rg.php
The mandate around vaccines rests on the government argument that
they prevent disease for the child taking the vaccines and provide
herd immunity (protection for other children) and on the
frightening “information” that the child could get polio or
whooping cough or measles or hepatitis B and die. But the
government argument is falling apart at every possible level. The
vaccines are not preventing diseases, are causing paralysis and
deaths, and increasing children’s risks.
From
Sebelius, HHS Censor Vaccine Concerns, Produce
‘Fertility Impairing Vaccine’:
“The Bill and Melinda Gates
Foundation and GAVI’s polio vaccines are causing
mass paralysis in India and Pakistan and
with a more deadly strain than natural polio; the
pertussus vaccines are spreading pertussis
via vaccinated populations and creating a more virulent strain;
the
measles vaccines aren’t working to protect
against measles; the
pentavalent vaccine is causing a high number
of adverse events and deaths; Andrew Wakefield’s work on the
MMR vaccine has been substantiated; and
these are only the most recent stories showing up primarily in
foreign media….
“Unlike conventional drug treatments
meant for the management of existing diseases, in prophylaxis
with vaccines, safety is of paramount importance. Vaccines that
frequently and unpredictably cause the death of healthy children
cannot be recommended [said Jacob Puliyel, an eminent
paediatrician at St. Stephen’s hospital in New Delhi and member of
the NTAGI - India's National Technical Advisory Group on
Immunisation] …. ” [Emphasis added.]
This list does not include the
government’s concession that the Hepatitis B
vaccine causes Lupus.
Vermont parents fought back but they left out of their arguments
two criminal and undeniable ones – 1) mandated vaccines which
include polysorbate 80 are compulsory sterilization (genocide);
and 2) the insertion of patented material into children’s DNA
without informing the parent and obtaining a legal release, is
theft of their child’s ownership of their own DNA (theft of
intellectual property by deceptive trade practices).
The Nuremberg Code was written to protect the world from the
gruesome experiments performed on concentration camp prisoners by
the pharmaceutical industry. They industry sought a means to
covertly sterilize those they wished to use merely as workers or
slaves, and to take over control of the world. The same industry
is still covertly sterilizing. And just as Monsanto is attempting
to “own” food through patented intellectual property claims and is
abetted by spread of its GMOs through contamination by pollen,
vaccine-enforced DNA contamination through injecting patented GMOs
into children’s DNA provides a means to take control of human DNA.
Here the companies are abetted in this human-DNA contamination
not by pollen but by corrupt state legislators.
Those legislators are abetting both the covert compulsory
sterilization of America’s children (genocide), and the deceptive
take over by multinational corporations of the ownership of
American children’s human DNA (biopiracy). Vermont stood firm
that parents decide. But there must be “informed” consent and
information on what is really happening with the vaccines has been
missing since it is unlikely that parents in the US would allow
their child to be vaccinated with vaccines that increase their
risk of disease, sterilize them, and steal their legal rights to
their own DNA.
People will boggle at all three pieces of information but with
the last is the newest threat, the theft of human-DNA, and people
will certainly ask
“For what purpose? In a Rense article in
2001 on the Bush administration’s deep ties to the pharmaceutical
industry and to Nazi Germany,
Robert Lederman describes the bizarre
direction these corporations are going and why.
“When we give government
the power to make medical decisions for us, we, in essence,
accept that the state owns our bodies.” U.S. Representative
Ron Paul
Jacob Puliyel, a pediatrician and a member of India’s National
Technical Advisory Group on Immunization (NTAGI), who helped
expose Bill Gates and the WHO’s the mass number of vaccine-induced
paralysis in India, does not dismiss those who have questions
about vaccines as anti-vaccinationists, or say they are killing
children, as Bill Gates did. Quite the opposite.
Puliyel makes a direct link to the Holocaust and
the danger of being obedient, and urges,
“The world depends on 35% of those who are
defiers–those who clearly see what is right and what is wrong.
But they need to speak up, to protest, and to stand up for
their ethical values. The future depends on you.”
In the Spirit of Truth,
Ingri Cassel, director
Vaccination Liberation
P.O. Box 457
Spirit Lake, Idaho 83869
(208) 255-2307 / (888) 249-1421
VacLib.org
VaccineTruth.com
NVICAdvocacy.org
“Free Your Mind....
From the Vaccine Paradigm”
“When we give government the power
to make medical decisions for us, we,
in
essence, accept that the state owns our
bodies.”
~U.S. Representative Ron Paul, MD
MB Comment:
Polio vaccines are causing paralysis and death in India and the local
press is reporting it (not the US press, of course). This article is
from the largest circulation English language paper in South India.