Friday, February 3, 2017

Measles Is NOT A Virus

Biologist Proves Measles Isn’t A Virus, Wins Supreme Court Case Against Doctor



From PreventDisease.com By DAVE MIHALOVIC In a recent ruling, judges at the German Federal Supreme Court (BGH) confirmed that the measles virus does not exist. Furthermore, there is not a single sc…
By DAVE MIHALOVIC

In a recent ruling, judges at the German Federal Supreme Court (BGH) confirmed that the measles virus does not exist. Furthermore, there is not a single scientific study in the world which could prove the existence of the virus in any scientific literature. This raises the question of what was actually injected into millions over the past few decades.

Not a single scientist, immunologist, infectious disease specialist or medical doctor has ever been able to establish a scientific foundation, not only for the vaccination of measles but any vaccination for infants, pregnant women, the elderly and even many adult subgroups.


The fact that many vaccines are ineffective is becoming increasingly apparent. Merck was slapped with two separate class action lawsuits contending they lied about the effectiveness of the mumps vaccine in their combination MMR shot, and fabricated efficacy studies to maintain the illusion for the past two decades that the vaccine is highly protective.


Studies such as one published in the Human and Experimental Toxicology journal found a direct statistical correlation between higher vaccine doses and infant mortality rates. The study, Infant mortality rates regressed against number of vaccine doses routinely given: Is there a biochemical or synergistic toxicity?, was conducted by Gary S. Goldman and Neil Z. Miller who has been studying the dangers of vaccines for 25 years.


MMR Vaccine
In the United States, children typically receive their mumps vaccination as part of the Measles, Mumps, and Rubella (MMR) vaccine. The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) advises children to receive their first dose between 12 and 18 months, and their second between the ages of 4 and 6.


Evidence has been published in the medical literature that vaccinated persons can get measles because either they do not respond to the vaccine or the vaccine’s efficacy wanes over time and vaccinated mothers do not transfer long lasting maternal antibodies to their infants to protect them in the first few months of life.


Brian Hooker’s published paper, is a comprehensive analysis of the CDC’s own data from 2003 revealing a 340% increased risk of autism in African-American children following the MMR vaccine.
Brian Hooker’s research in the Translational Neurodegeneration Journal provides the most recent epidemiological evidence showing that African American males receiving the MMR vaccine prior to 24 months of age or 36 months of age are more likely to receive an autism diagnosis.


Whistleblower Dr. William Thompson confirmed that “the CDC knew about the relationship between the age of first MMR vaccine and autism incidence in African-American boys as early as 2003, but chose to cover it up.” He remarked “we’ve missed ten years of research because the CDC is so paralyzed right now by anything related to autism. They’re not doing what they should be doing because they’re afraid to look for things that might be associated.” He alleges criminal wrongdoing by his supervisors, and he expressed deep regret about his role in helping the CDC hide data.


Measles Virus Does Not Exist
German biologist Dr. Stefan Lanka initially offered 100,000 euros to anyone who could provide scientific evidence that the measles virus existed. He had initially been ordered to pay up in court after Doctor David Bardens attempted to claim the prize after providing the biologist with a study that had been published in a medical journal. At that time, a Judge in the regional court in Ravensburg, South Germany, ruled in the favour of Dr. Bardens in a controversial decision claiming the criteria for evidence had been met.


The First Civil Senate of the BGH confirmed a judgment by the Higher Regional Court of Stuttgart (OLG) on in February 2016. The sum of 100,000 euros which was offered as a reward for scientific proof of the existence of the alleged measles virus did have to be paid to the plaintiff. The plaintiff also was ordered to bear all procedural costs.


Five experts have been involved in the case and presented the results of scientific studies. All five experts, including Prof. Dr. Dr. Andreas Podbielski who had been appointed by the OLG Stuttgart as the preceding court, have consistently found that none of the six publications which have been introduced to the trial, contains scientific proof of the existence of the alleged measles virus.


In the trial, the results of research into so-called genetic fingerprints of alleged measles virus have been introduced. Two recognised laboratories, including the world’s largest and leading genetic Institute, arrived at exactly the same results independently.The results prove that the authors of the six publications in the measles virus case were wrong, and as a direct result all measles virologists are still wrong today: They have misinterpreted ordinary constituents of cells as part of the suspected measles virus.


Because of this error, during decades of consensus building process, normal cell constituents were mentally assembled into a model of a measles virus. To this day, an actual structure that corresponds to this model has been found neither in a human, nor in an animal. With the results of the genetic tests, all thesis of existence of measles virus has been scientifically disproved.


The authors of the six publications and all other persons involved, did not realise the error because they violated the fundamental scientific duty, which is the need to work “lege artis”, i.e. in accordance with internationally defined rules and best practice of science. They did not carry out any control experiments. Control experiments would have protected authors and mankind from this momentous error. This error became the basis of belief in the existence of any disease-causing viruses. The expert appointed by the court, Prof. Dr. Dr. Podbielski, answering to the relevant question by the court, as per page 7 of the protocol explicitly confirmed that the authors did not conduct any control experiments.


The OLG Stuttgart overturned the judgment of the court of first instance, dismissed the action and referred, inter alia, to the central message of Prof. Podbielski with respect to the six publications. The plaintiff filed an appeal against the judgment of the OLG to the Supreme Court. As reason he stated his subjective, yet factually false perception of the trial sequence at the court in Stuttgart, and the assertion that our naming of facts about measles posed a threat to public health. The plaintiff’s position was rejected by the Supreme Court in plain words. Thus, the Supreme Court confirmed the judgment of the OLG Stuttgart from February 16, 2016.


The six publications submitted in the trial are the main relevant publications on the subject of “measles virus.” Since further to these six publications there not any other publications which would attempt by scientific methods to prove the existence of the measles virus, the Supreme Court judgment in the measles virus trial and the results of the genetic tests have consequences: Any national and international statements on the alleged measles virus, the infectivity of measles, and on the benefit and safety of vaccination against measles, are since then of no scientific character and have thus been deprived of their legal basis.


Upon enquiries which had been triggered by the measles virus contest, the head of the National Reference Institute for Measles at the Robert Koch Institute (RKI), Prof. Dr. Annette Mankertz, admitted an important fact. This admission may explain the increased rate of vaccination-induced disabilities, namely of vaccination against measles, and why and how specifically this kind of vaccination seems to increasingly trigger autism.


Prof. Mankertz has admitted that the “measles virus” contains typical cell’s natural components (ribosomes, the protein factories of the cell). Since the vaccination against measles contains whole “whole measles virus”, this vaccine contains cell’s own structures. This explains why vaccination against measles causes frequent and more severe allergies and autoimmune reactions than other types of vaccination. The court expert Prof. Podbielski stated on several occasions that by the assertion of the RKI with regard to ribosomes in the measles virus, the thesis of existence of measles virus has been falsified.


In the trial it was also put on record that the highest German scientific authority in the field of infectious diseases, the RKI, contrary to its legal remit as per 4 Infection Protection Act (IfSG), has failed to create tests for alleged measles virus and to publish these. The RKI claims that it made internal studies on measles virus, however refuses to hand over or publish the results.
END QUOTE


Additional information:   All living cells contain ribosomes, tiny organelles composed of approximately 60 percent ribosomal RNA (rRNA) and 40 percent protein. However, though they are generally described as organelles, it is important to note that ribosomes are not bound by a membrane and are much smaller than other organelles. Some cell types may hold a few million ribosomes, but several thousand is more typical. The organelles require the use of an electron microscope to be visually detected.  See  https://micro.magnet.fsu.edu/cells/ribosomes/ribosomes.html



Differences between Viruses and Bacteria   http://www.diffen.com/difference/Bacteria_vs_Virus


                    ________    Bacteria                                                                                     Virus_____

Ribosomes                      Present                                                                                      Absent

Cell wall        Peptidoglycan / Lipopolysaccharide                                                       No cell wall. Protein coat present instead.

Living attributes        Living organism                                                                          Opinions differ on whether viruses are a
                                                                                                                                     form of life or organic structures that
                                                                                                                                      interact with living organisms.

Introduction           Bacteria constitute a large domain of prokaryotic                      A virus is a small infectious agent that replicates only
(from Wikipedia)   microorganisms. Typically a few micrometres in length,            inside the living cells of other organisms.
                              bacteria have a number of shapes, ranging from spheres
                              to rods and spirals.    

Reproduction         Fission- a form of asexual reproduction                                       Invades a host cell and takes over the cell causing it to make copies of the viral DNA/RNA.
                                                                                                                                     Destroys the host cell releasing new viruses.

Number of cells              Unicellular; one cell                                                                No cells; not living

Structures                  DNA and RNA floating freely in cytoplasm.                            DNA or RNA enclosed inside a coat of protein.                         
                                   Has cell wall and cell membrane.    

Treatment                      Antibiotics                                                                          Vaccines prevent the spread and antiviral medications help to slow
                                                                                                                                       reproduction but can not stop it completely.

Enzymes                                  Yes                                                                                   Yes, in some

Infection                             Localized                                                                                Systemic

Benefits                            Some bacteria are beneficial                                             Viruses are not beneficial. However, a particular virus may be able to
                                 (e.g. certain bacteria are required in the gut)                          destroy brain tumors (see references). Viruses can be useful in genetic engineering.

Size                                      Larger (1000nm)                                                                  Smaller (20 - 400nm)


+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++


it is the BS of viruses (root in Latin means poison) that is the subject of microbiologist Stefan Lanka's 100,000 Euro challenge.  To understand the depth of deception, spend some time on his website:
http://www.shotsoftruth.com/





If the above doesn't format correctly, go to   http://www.diffen.com/difference/Bacteria_vs_Virus




































Saturday, December 17, 2016

MOST POWERFUL SYNOPSIS ON THE VACCINE ISSUE

  MOST POWERFUL SYNOPSIS ON 
THE VACCINE ISSUE TO DATE

LAURA HAYES is one of the best speakers and activists on the safety and efficacy of vaccines!


We want to thank Vaccination Liberation Army for the following information and suggestions.

VLA COMMENT: VLA has been in the business of collecting data, articles and you tubes on vaccines since the 90s.  This speech by Laura Hayes taken from the Weston A. Price Foundation conference in Nov. 2016, in my opinion, is the single most profound synopsis of the Vaccine issue I have every heard.  This speech is 1 hr 20 min.  I urge everyone in ear shot of my voice to take the time and get blown away;  to pretend that they went to the conference, didn’t have to pay and are  at the conference yet still remaining in the comfort of their living room.    Laura Hayes’ lecture should be played at every state legislature with full legislator presence…but that might be quite a task unless you are the Pope.

I would therefore suggest that this video, like a TED talk, be played in small groups of legislators.  

Lots of legislators in Iowa for example, stay at hotels or housing in Des Moines during the legislative session. One would think that these men and women might like a private screening, a little wine and some pate on one of those cold lonely nights.  

Every town library, near the capitol buildings will have a room with audio video equipment.  And usually they will also allow snacks.  Another alternative is to get a legislator to hold it at a private room at the capitol.  See if that is possible.  He or she can send out a colleague letter invitation.


I would guarantee that once one group sees this that they would help organize other groups of their colleague legislators. That is how profound this is !


And what about the principles, administrator and supervisors at schools as a group – one cold night, with popcorn.

After you see this video, here is the transcript of the speech in .doc form so that you can cut and paste different sections for your use in articles, facebook strategies or invitations to the video lecture at your library. 

 I suggest when putting this on facebook you consider focusing on some purposeful action such as but not limited to the suggestions above.

laura-hayes-pdf
laura-hayes-age-of-autism-DOC
Age of Autism complete video and transcript of Laura Hayes lecture in one


Friday, December 16, 2016

Things You Didn't Know About Polio

13 Things You Didn't Know About Polio

1. In the 1800's a popular wallpaper called Paris Green was infused with a potent pesticide. Some of the most toxic substances known to man: copper and arsenic or lead and arsenic.

2. This pesticide worked by causing neurological damage in the bugs, causing organ failure.

3. Polio consists of symptoms synonymous with neurological damage, causing organ failure.

4. Heavy metal poisoning from lead, mercury and other similar heavy metals manifest lesions on neurological tissues, meaning the toxin destroys the nerve/communication pathways connecting the brain to the organs in the body.

5. Polio victims present lesions on neurological tissue, that cause the organs to malfunction all around the body. (lungs, heart, nerves that control walking etc)

6. Polio outbreaks hit throughout the summer, only during pesticide spraying times. (not the sunless and damp winter/spring seasons like other disease outbreaks)

7. Polio had NO ability to spread from infected victims to the uninfected. Polio infected clusters of people in the exact same areas, suddenly and swiftly.

8. Parents report finding their children paralyzed in and around apple orchards. One of the most heavily pesticide sprayed crops of the time (with lead arsenate or copper arsenate) were apple orchards.

9. President Roosevelt became paralyzed over night while on his farm in the summer, which contained many crops, including apple orchards. He also swam the day prior in a bay that was heavily polluted by industrial agricultural run off.

10. Dr. Ralph Scobey and Dr. Mortind Biskind testified in front of the U.S Congress in 1951 that the paralysis around the country known as polio was being caused by industrial poisons and that a virus theory was purposely fabricated by the chemical industry and the government to deflect litigation away from both parties.

11. In 1956 the AMA (The American Medical Association) instructed each licensed medical doctor that they could no longer classify polio as polio, or their license to practice would be terminated. Any paralysis was now to be diagnosed as AFP (acute flaccid paralysis) MS, MD, Bell's Palsy, cerebral palsy, ALS (Lou Gehrig's Disease), Guillian-Barre etc etc. This was orchestrated purposely to make the public believe polio was eradicated by the polio vaccine campaign, but because the polio vaccine contained toxic ingredients directly linked to paralysis, polio cases (not identified as polio) were skyrocketing...but only in vaccinated areas.

12. The first polio vaccine was worked on by Dr. Jonas Salk and human experiments using this vaccine were conducted purposely on orphans in government/church run institutions because they were vulnerable and didn't require any parental consent signatures, as they had no parents. The vaccine was "declared safe" by "medicine" (as they always are) and that vaccine gave 40,000 orphans polio, permanently paralyzed hundreds and killed at least 10 children. All injuries and deaths under-reported of course by the same authorities who orchestrated the atrocity. This was called The Cutter Incident.

13. The next "improved" polio vaccine, given to hundreds of millions, carried both the SV 40 cancer virus as well as the AIDS virus. Every step of the way, medicine declaring they know for sure, that this time, they have everything straightened out. Same story then, same story now.

Wednesday, December 14, 2016

Trojan Horse Mechanism



Aluminum in Vaccines is a Direct Path from Needle to your Immune Cells and Finally to your BRAIN by a “TROJAN HORSE” mechanism.

Pro Vaxxers, Be Forewarned!  Authors State: “These novel insights strongly suggest that serious re-evaluation of long-term aluminum adjuvant phamacokinetics and safety should be carried out.”

I have some recent research for you that provides a smoking gun to vaccine induced injury. This is one time I’d like to have the trolls I banned back on the page. I would want to read their name calling attempts to discredit the authors of the work, since discrediting an author is the means to your end when you cannot take on the story. So, let’s get to the amazing story.

This science comes from French researchers. I don’t think these people are anti-fluoride “whackos”, that might “discredit” their vaccine findings. The main research article is entitled: “Biopersistence and brain translocation of aluminum adjuvants of vaccines.” I think most of you can understand what the title alone is telling you. Aluminum adjuvants in vaccines PERSIST and are RELOCATED to the BRAIN.

I’ll copy and paste some passages for you:

“We previously showed that poorly biodegradable aluminum-coated particles injected into muscle are promptly phagocytosed in muscle and the draining lymph nodes, and can disseminate within phagocytic cells throughout the body and slowly accumulate in brain. This strongly suggests that long-term adjuvant biopersistence within phagocytic cells is a prerequisite for slow brain translocation and delayed neurotoxicity.”

Translation: aluminum crystals in vaccines are taken up (eaten) by immune cells, persist long term, and are relocated to the brain, where they accumulate!

The article continues stating that immune cells which pick up the foreign alum particles have but one mechanism to get rid of them – self destruction with acid secretion, which is the only means to solubilize (dissolve) the alum irritating particles. By a deranged immune reaction to the particles, alum is transferred to the brain through a “Trojan horse mechanism”. (Please read about the “Trojan horse” on Wikipedia if you are unfamiliar with that term.

“Concerns about the use of aluminum adjuvants have emerged following (i) recognition of their role at the origin of the so-called macrophagic myofasciitis (MMF) lesion in 2001 (3, 4), which revealed fundamental misconception of their adjuvant effect and pointed out their unexpectedly long-lasting biopersistence (4); and (ii) demonstration of their apparent capacity to migrate in lymphoid organs and then disseminate throughout the body within monocyte-lineage cells and progressively accumulate in the brain (5).”

Translation: The scientists were surprised aluminum last so long and it is carried within immune cells to distant organs like the brain, where it accumulates.

“The present paper will review these emerging characteristics of alum adjuvant particles that raise concerns about innocuity of this widely used compound.”

Translation: The mainstream pundits consider aluminum innocuous, but we have concerns!

I put forward here the abstract of their latest publication. My comments and translations are in brackets [ ].

Aluminum adjuvants of vaccines injected into the muscle: Normal fate, pathology and associated disease

Summary

Aluminum oxyhydroxide (Alhydrogel®) is a nano-crystalline compound forming aggregates that has been introduced in vaccine for its immunologic adjuvant effect in 1926. It is the most commonly used adjuvant in human and veterinary vaccines but mechanisms by which it stimulates immune responses remain ill-defined. Although generally well tolerated on the short term, it has been suspected to occasionally cause delayed neurologic problems in susceptible individuals. In particular, the long-term persistence of aluminic granuloma [a;uminum caused inflammation] also termed macrophagic [inflammatory immune cells] myofasciitis is associated with chronic arthromyalgias [joint and muscle pains] and fatigue and cognitive [brain] dysfunction. Safety concerns largely depend on the long biopersistence time [it persists a long time in the body] inherent to this adjuvant, which may be related to its quick withdrawal from the interstitial fluid by avid cellular uptake; and the capacity of adjuvant particles to migrate and slowly accumulate in lymphoid organs and the brain, a phenomenon documented in animal models and resulting from MCP1/CCL2-dependant translocation of adjuvant-loaded monocyte-lineage cells (Trojan horse phenomenon). [Immune cells trying to defend the body take up the aluminum and carry it elsewhere. Being “self” the poisoned immune cells can enter new areas, like the brain, where they self destruct leaving behind the toxic aluminum]. These novel insights strongly suggest that serious re-evaluation of long-term aluminum adjuvant phamacokinetics and safety should be carried out. [Hey world, we need a serious re-evaluation of aluminum safety in vaccines].

http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2015.00004

Folks, this is REAL serious business for you and for your children. The flu vaccine compelled upon many people is so full of aluminum that famous immunologist Hugh Fudenberg, PhD, now deceased, told a room full of doctors that 5 consecutive yearly flu shots dramatically increased the risk of Alzheimer’s. This report explains, years after the fact, and years after the pundits made a mockery of Fudenberg and integrative doctors like my peers, that the adjuvant is indeed highly dangerous. Why is it that the anti-fluoride whackos knew fluoride was toxic long before the current paradigm shift, and the anti-vaxxers knew there was a real problem with vaccines burning their children (Rome) while the Caesars (your rulers) play the violin and force setting more fires in your kids.

I don’t think that aluminum in vaccines is absolutely dangerous for everyone. If so, all children would be damaged (but the injury numbers are increasing by the month). Neither is a six-gun with a single bullet in the chamber dangerous for all 6 playing Russian roulette. Only one will die. If you knew which chamber had the bullet, you would know which person in the line would blow his head off. And, if you knew in advance which child has the propensity to carry aluminum around like a Trojan horse, you might know in advance which child NOT to shoot with an aluminum bullet.
( I’ll give you additional clips from these researchers: ). “Alum is deficient at initiating cell-mediated immunity and skews the immune response toward a T-helper type 2 (Th2) response.” Translation: aluminum wrecks the all important cellular immune response and pushes your immune system towards a response that can lead to allergies.]

“Aluminum has long been identified as a neurotoxic metal, affecting memory, cognition and psychomotor control, altering neurotransmission and synaptic activity, damaging the blood–brain barrier (BBB), exerting pro-oxidant effects, activating microglia and neuroinflammation, depressing the cerebral glucose metabolism and mitochondrial functions, interfering with transcriptional activity, and promoting beta-amyloid and neurofilament aggregation (56). In addition, alum particles impact the immune system through their adjuvant effect and by many other means. They adsorb vaccine antigens on their surface, which protect them from proteolysis thus forming a persistently immunogenic pseudo-pathogen (57). Alum particles may also bind undesirable residual products inherent to vaccine production procedures, as shown for HPV DNA sequences (58) or yeast proteins (59) that may be potentially hazardous (60). Finally, alum particles can directly induce allergy (61, 62) as other metals (63).”

Translation – this is one terribly nasty toxin you do NOT want injected into your body.
“The fate of particulate material was explored in mice by our team. We successively performed i.m. [intramuscular] injections of alum-containing vaccine, fluorescent latex beads, and fluorescent nanohybrids coated with precipitated alum (5). These materials were quickly captured by macrophages, a large proportion of which cleaved the injected muscle, mainly within immune cells, reaching the draining lymph nodes. Particle-laden cells then escaped the lymphatic system to reach the blood circulation, presumably via the thoracic duct. In so-doing, they were able to reach distant organs such as the spleen and liver and, much slowly, the brain.”

Translation – injected aluminum into your muscle is taken up by your immune cells, reach the general circulation and then redeposit the toxin in critical organs, inclusive of SLOWLY and cumulatively into your brain.

The latter is simply too important to ignore. The slow uptake by the brain can explain why you might not see a vaccine induced brain injury for some time after the vaccine. Then progression to, say, autism, will be considered a “random” event. I say “BULLS#@T” This is exactly why this phenomena cannot be properly studied. It can take days, weeks, m
onths, and perhaps years after a vaccine for the toxins therein to induce the carnage. By then the mayhem brain and immune effects will be considered by the pundits to be “random”, and you’ll be forced to inflict another potentially devastating vaccine on your child just to enter school.

Finally, one banned naysayer here tried to convince us that we get a lot more aluminum exposure in our diets since the metal is ubiquitous. That is true, but decidedly misleading. Aluminum in diet is not injected particles. First, your gut would not absorb particles. Second, aluminum in diet is poorly soluble and absorption is highly limited. (J Lab Clin Med. 1989 Sep;114(3):237-42.). Since the metal is common, God designed your gut to deal with what is natural and limit absorption of this dangerous but common metal.

Folks, I strongly encourage you to read the references I am providing. I respectfully ask the pro-forced vaxxers here to come back and offer logic and science refuting this killer information. I will not tolerate name-calling and hitting below the belt, either towards the authors or to me, or anyone on the page. I will ban you. Please respond respectfully as this is an important discussion concerning our progeny (and our own generation as well). To me, this information is really white hot and should be immediately carried by the concerned parents right to the doors of your legislative rulers, before we permit more kids to be knocked off in the horrible “game” of Russian vaccine-roulette. Please tell us, with reason, why you might disagree after reading.


Additional References and links:
Lupus. 2012 Feb;21(2):184-9. doi: 10.1177/0961203311429557.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26948677
http://journal.frontiersin.org/…/10.3…/fneur.2015.00004/full
Morphologie
Volume 100, Issue 329, June 2016, Pages 85–94
Special issue: Cellular and tissular effects of aluminum

(NOTE: I am not the author of the above written article but the evidence contained in that said article  substantiates the claim that a strong possibility exists that vaccinations can and do cause harm to the unsuspecting innocent bodies of our children.)

This is just an excerpt of the full 55 minute broadcast 
with Janet Edghill which aired on Hawaii PBS.


Below is the FULL VERSION which aired on PBS Hawaii



Educate BEFORE You Vaccinate!

Tuesday, November 1, 2016

ASH Research Guide

An Independent Research Group is making available over 50 years of health information and research data. Advanced scientific health researchers have reviewed the data, facts and findings; applied the knowledge at their own personal level; and stand with their evidence that the Facts are Indisputable.

The Group has developed an Elemental Health Research Guide that is now available as a resource for Health Care Professionals AND Families.  Get your FREE COPY Below. 



    

Feel free to download and save and/or email the link to your friends 
and family that may be looking for answers to their health questions.





Tuesday, October 11, 2016

Dr. Kent Holtorf - Infectious Disease Specialist

Dr. Kent Holtorf, Infectious Disease Specialist, had this to say about the safety of vaccine adjuvants and whether or not he would administer them to his children.

A growing number of medical doctors are becoming more concerned with the danger of vaccinations. Here are just a few more. Research and Educate BEFORE You choose to Vaccinate.